ENDOG statistics

To access cutting-edge analytics on consensus tools, life science contexts and associated fields, you will need to subscribe to our premium service.

Subscribe
info

Citations per year

Citations chart
info

Popular tool citations

chevron_left Identity by descent chevron_right
Popular tools chart
info

Tool usage distribution map

Tool usage distribution map
info

Associated diseases

Associated diseases

ENDOG specifications

Information


Unique identifier OMICS_18547
Name ENDOG
Software type Package/Module
Interface Command line interface
Restrictions to use None
Input data Some data to identify the individuals, the identification of the herd or population corresponding to the individual or any other.
Input format xls, .dbf
Output data A summary results for on screen viewing after most analyses.
Output format mdb
Operating system Windows
Programming languages Visual Basic
Computer skills Advanced
Version 4.8
Stability Stable
Maintained Yes

Download


Versioning


Add your version

Documentation


Maintainer


Publication for ENDOG

ENDOG in publications

 (6)
PMCID: 5648486
PMID: 29047357
DOI: 10.1186/s13028-017-0338-4

[…] data of 2900 stallions and 4158 mares which constituted all registered horses born between 1836 and 2010. inbreeding coefficients were calculated for each mare, stallion and expected foal using endog software []. the average generation equivalent of the bfdh population between 2000 and 2010 was 7.2. grouping of inbreeding classes of expected foals was adapted to a more uniform distribution […]

PMCID: 5557481
PMID: 28806925
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3933-x

[…] as a whole [])., analysis of pedigree-based inbreeding was performed on a pedigree of 25,526 animals including the genotyped animals. calculations of inbreeding coefficients were conducted using endog software []. the following parameters describe the completeness of the pedigree: mean maximum generations (number of generations separating the individual from its furthest ancestor) = 11.26, […]

PMCID: 5123354
PMID: 27884111
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3

[…] was equal to 3 (fig. ). pedigree with both sire and dam known was available for 7376 of those sires. pedigree completeness was assessed by the number of equivalent generations calculated using the endog software [] and was estimated at 4.27 in the pedigree provided.fig. 2 , the dataset for the preliminary analysis was constructed by retaining only the first record for each animal to avoid […]

PMCID: 4732815
PMID: 26824579
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147941

[…] year of birth from 1980–2013 and inbreeding rate, were also calculated., effective population size (ne) was estimated from the rate of inbreeding per generation (δf) using ne = 0.5δf in the program endog v4.8 []. the relative increase in inbreeding by generation (δf) for the reference population was calculated using the following regression approach: δf=fn − fn−11−fn−1 where fn − fn−1 = l × b, […]

PMCID: 4399946
PMID: 25880228
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124157

[…] shown in ., the pedigree data set, provided by the spanish holstein association (conafe), was constructed with all known ancestors of genotyped individuals and comprised 35,473 animals. the software endog [] was used to calculate the average numbers of generations traced (14.50), full traced generations (2.56) and equivalent complete generations (6.12). the generation interval (l) was calculated […]


To access a full list of publications, you will need to upgrade to our premium service.

ENDOG institution(s)
Departamento de Produccion Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Madrid, Spain; SERIDA-Somio, C/Camino de los Claveles, Gijon, Spain
ENDOG funding source(s)
Partially supported by two grants from INIA no. RZ02-020 and no. RZ03-011.

ENDOG reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Be the first to review ENDOG