MACS specifications

Unique identifier:
Software type:
Restrictions to use:
Input format:
Output format:
Programming languages:
Computer skills:
Model-based Analysis for ChIP-Seq
Command line interface
Input data:
A tag file, a treatment file
Output data:
Peaks, peak locations, negative peaks, model image, diagnosis report
Operating system:
Artistic License version 2.0


tutorial arrow
Upload and version your source code
Get a DOI for each update to improve tool traceability. Archive your releases so the community can easily visualize progress on your work.
Facilitate your tool traceability
Sign up for free to upload your code and get a DOI

No versioning.

MACS distribution


MACS support



  • Wei Li <>


tutorial arrow
Communicate with other users
Participate in the forum to get support for using tools. Ask questions about technical specifications.
Take part in the discussion
Sign up for free to ask question and share your advices


tutorial arrow
Promote your skills
Define all the tasks you managed and assign your profile the appropriate badges. Become an active member.
Promote your work
Sign up for free to badge your contributorship



Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Gene Security Network, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA; Molecular Pathology Unit and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Biostatistics, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

Funding source(s)

NIH grants HG004069, HG004270 and DK074967

User review

tutorial arrow
Vote up tools and offer feedback
Give value to tools and make your expertise visible
Give your feedback on this tool
Sign up for free to join and share with the community
Sort by:

2 user reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

2 user reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star
Miklós Laczik's avatar image Miklós Laczik's country flag

Miklós Laczik

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Arguably a gold standard among peak callers, MACS is excellent in detecting significant enrichments in point-source enrichment type NGS data, like ChIP-seq data with transcription factors. It is easy to use, well documented, well maintained. It can be run both with or without a control sample, and the options give you a decent flexibility (setting significance treshold, switching the model building on or off, determining the fragment size to match the experimentally determined size, working with various file formats from BED through BAM to proprietary Illumina formats etc.) It has a decent speed too.
I think it's important to understand that it is designed for point-source data, and for that it works perfectly (that's why I gave maximum rating, despite the constraints described in the following section, which I don't see as a fault - it's really not intended for the tasks below.) Numerous tests show (even a paper published by the MACS authors) that when it comes to diffuse enrichments, most notably, ChIP-seq with histone marks, then MACS fails to identify the peaks correctly. Usually it manages to detect some parts of it, some local summits within the dispersed signal, if it detects something at all. Although in the literature it is used for various datasets, including histone marks, ATAC-seq, MeDIP-seq etc., I wouldn't recommend it for detecting other enrichments than point-source peaks. There are much superior tools out there for diffuse signals (like SICER). I have to mention though that maybe H3K4me3 is an exception, it is a very "TF-like" histone mark, with sharp, clear, high enrichments, and for that mark only MACS might be acceptable. But I wouldn't trust it for any other HMs (and I've been working with ChIP-seq data of all histone marks you can imagine for ~10 years). I would also take the results of MeDIP-seq. ATAC-seq and similar data with a grain of salt if it was processed with MACS, because while it can certainly detect some enrichment, not all ofthem can be considered point-source, many methylated regions, open chromatin etc. are way broader than that.

With that said, I think it's a great tool for what it was designed.
Be aware that the MACS website is still saying that the newest version is version 1.4.2, which is not true, it has long been superceded by the major version 2, which you can find on GitHub (at the time of writing this review the latest stable version is 2.1.0).

Fabien Pichon's avatar image Fabien Pichon's country flag

Fabien Pichon

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

A very good software to find peaks in ChIP-seq experiments (except for broad peaks like H3K27me3 and H3K36me3 where you should prefer SICER). Also works perfectly with ATAC-seq where you can use it without input (-c option).
Easy to install and use.