PubPeer statistics

Tool stats & trends

Looking to identify usage trends or leading experts?

PubPeer specifications


Unique identifier OMICS_19492
Name PubPeer
Restrictions to use None
Community driven No
Data access Browse
User data submission Not allowed
Maintained Yes


  • person_outline PubPeer Team

PubPeer citations


A multi disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

PMCID: 5686505
PMID: 29188015
DOI: 10.5256/f1000research.13023.r24353

[…] opted by journals, other post-publication annotation and commenting services exist independent of any specific journal or publisher and operating across platforms, such as, PaperHive, and PubPeer.Initiatives such as the Peerage of Science(, RUBRIQ (, and Axios Review (; closed in 2017) have implemented decoupled models of peer review. […]


Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case control study

PMCID: 4575810
PMID: 26387520
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4708

[…] ely provided or even intended by prepublication peer review. An alternative mechanism for readers to communicate discrepancies to other readers would be an annotation system such as PubMed Commons or Pubpeer. This circumvents the system of letters to the editor, which is becoming unfit for this purpose because of word count limits and short six week limitation periods in some journals.Who would do […]


Emerging trends in peer review—a survey

Front Neurosci
PMCID: 4444765
PMID: 26074753
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00169

[…] has not prevented the emergence of channels offering facilities for informal commentary as their main service, or as part of their service. Examples in the sample include F1000 Prime, PubMed Commons,, Mendeley, and ResearchGate. Mendeley and ResearchGate present themselves as social networks for academics and repositories for documents originally published elsewhere.—anoth […]


Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns

PLoS One
PMCID: 4363625
PMID: 25780916
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120495

[…] croblogging platforms such Twitter and Weibo, posts on social network sites such as Facebook and Google+, saves on social reference managers Mendeley and CiteULike, reviews on F1000Prime, Publons and PubPeer, as well as mentions in scholarly blogs and news and mainstream media. Thus, they encompass various types of usage, levels of engagement, user groups and audiences, are affected by different u […]


Looking to check out a full list of citations?

PubPeer reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Be the first to review PubPeer