SCAMPI protocols

View SCAMPI computational protocol

SCAMPI statistics

To access cutting-edge analytics on consensus tools, life science contexts and associated fields, you will need to subscribe to our premium service.


Citations per year

Citations chart

Popular tool citations

chevron_left Transmembrane helix prediction chevron_right
Popular tools chart

Tool usage distribution map

Tool usage distribution map

Associated diseases

Associated diseases

SCAMPI specifications


Unique identifier OMICS_07186
Interface Web user interface
Restrictions to use None
Computer skills Basic
Stability Stable
Maintained Yes

Publication for SCAMPI

SCAMPI in pipeline

PMCID: 3724490
PMID: 23663308
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-317

[…] using matgat 2.03 [] using default settings (blosum50 matrix, gap opening and extending gap penalty set to 12 and 2, respectively). transmembrane domains of t. urticae abcs were predicted using the scampi prediction server []. subcellular localization was predicted using targetp 1.0 [] . gene structures of t. urticae abcs were visualized using the coordinates of each t. urticae abc transporter […]

To access a full list of citations, you will need to upgrade to our premium service.

SCAMPI in publications

PMCID: 5852111
PMID: 29568304
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00282

[…] website: proteins were identified by searches using the transmembrane structure prediction software tools tmhmm server v. 2.0 (), phobius (), and scampi-single () according to the methods of . only candidate proteins that were predicted by two out of the three software programs were deemed to be mps. the change in relative concentration […]

PMCID: 5620054
PMID: 28959054
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11543-z

[…] multiple methods and uses a hidden-markov model to estimate the consensus topology from the methods for a predicted transmembrane protein. as recommended by the authors, the four methods used were: scampi-single; s-tmhmm; hmmtop; and memsat. to ensure that all predicted membrane proteins were valid proteins with acceptable transcriptional support and recognized protein-coding annotation, […]

PMCID: 5389847
PMID: 28355220
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005375

[…] are found in the supplementary material ( to figs). it is worth mentioning that these predictors operate with different definitions of disorder, so a consensus should not be expected., we used scampi [] to predict the fraction of transmembrane residues in a protein. the fraction of low-complexity residues is predicted using seg []. psipred [] was used to predict the secondary structure […]

PMCID: 5694209
PMID: 29158982
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4051

[…] were used to perform in silico analysis of membrane-bound proteins via the following bioinformatics tools., seven prediction methods including tmhmm 2.0 (), s-tmhmm (), hmmtop (), phobius (), scampi-single (), memsat 1.0 () and toppred () were chosen for tm prediction. for tmhmm 2.0, transmembrane helices and the locations were predicted; the most likely locations of transmembrane motifs […]

PMCID: 4815072
PMID: 27030248
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2592-7

[…] and is to use several prediction methods and make a consensus or majority decision regarding topology. topcons-single uses a consensus decision method that comprises five different prediction tools: scampi-single []; s-tmhmm []; memsat 1.0 []; hmmtop []; and phobius []. the benchmark of membrane helix predictions from sequence website was used to assess the accuracy of the methods used […]

To access a full list of publications, you will need to upgrade to our premium service.

SCAMPI institution(s)
Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

SCAMPI reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Be the first to review SCAMPI