Slicembler statistics

info info

Citations per year

Number of citations per year for the bioinformatics software tool Slicembler
info

Tool usage distribution map

This map represents all the scientific publications referring to Slicembler per scientific context
info info

Associated diseases

info

Popular tool citations

chevron_left Assembly reconciliation chevron_right
Want to access the full stats & trends on this tool?

Slicembler specifications

Information


Unique identifier OMICS_09314
Name Slicembler
Software type Package/Module
Interface Command line interface
Restrictions to use None
Operating system Unix/Linux
Programming languages Python
Computer skills Advanced
Stability Beta
Maintained Yes

Versioning


No version available

Documentation


Maintainer


  • person_outline Hamid Mirebrahim

Publication for Slicembler

Slicembler citation

library_books

Comparing and Evaluating Metagenome Assembly Tools from a Microbiologist’s Perspective Not Only Size Matters!

2017
PLoS One
PMCID: 5242441
PMID: 28099457
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169662

[…] tly before SOAPdenovo2 was published and incorporates SOAPdenovo v1.05 and v1.06 as integral assembly components, using optimized parameters and revised error correction as well as scaffolding steps. SLICEMBLER [] is a pipeline designed for ultra deep sequencing datasets using a “divide and conquer” approach. The read dataset is evenly divided into subsets, which are then assembled independently u […]


Want to access the full list of citations?
Slicembler institution(s)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering; Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
Slicembler funding source(s)
This work was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation [DBI-1062301] and [IIS-1302134], by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2009-65300-05645], by the USAID Feed the Future program [AID-OAA-A-13-00070] and the UC Riverside Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch Project CA-R-BPS-5306-H.

Slicembler review

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Marco

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star
Desktop
poor manual and user unfriendly