TeX Live statistics

Tool stats & trends

Looking to identify usage trends or leading experts?

Protocols

TeX Live specifications

Information


Unique identifier OMICS_21609
Name TeX Live
Software type Toolkit/Suite
Interface Command line interface, Graphical user interface
Restrictions to use None
Output format PDF
Operating system Unix/Linux, Mac OS, Windows
Computer skills Advanced
Stability Stable
Requirements
Cygwin
Maintained Yes
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeX_Live

Subtools


  • BibTeX
  • ConTEXt
  • LaTeX2e
  • Metafont
  • MetaPost
  • TEX

Versioning


No version available

Maintainer


  • person_outline Team TeXlive

Additional information


http://www.tug.org/texlive/doc/texlive-en/texlive-en.html#installation http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq/

TeX Live citations

 (41)
library_books

The tragedy of the biodiversity data commons: a data impediment creeping nigher?

2018
PMCID: 5892138
PMID: 29688384
DOI: 10.1093/database/bay033

[…] al) or a DOI pointing to all contributing datasets was included.All analysis and data management were performed in R () using the following R packages: RefManageR, rcrossref, plyr, readxl, extrafont, bibtex, reshape and ggplot2 (). […]

library_books

Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles

2018
PMCID: 5764597
PMID: 29339937
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2018.181

[…] ().WoS and Scopus databases allowed us to directly extract the number of all articles and number of FAs for each journal using built-in services. However, for PubMed, we first exported the corpus to BibTex and then to MS Excel (Microsoft, USA), in which we performed the analysis using the crosstab function.We found that some BMJ journals were not indexed by all three databases, so these journals […]

library_books

Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis

2017
BMJ Open
PMCID: 5588993
PMID: 28877950
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017196

[…] el. The process of literature research will be displayed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis flowchart. Study collection and assorting will be performed in BibTex V.0.99d. […]

library_books

The new alchemy: Online networking, data sharing and research activity distribution tools for scientists

2017
F1000Res
PMCID: 5580431
PMID: 28928951
DOI: 10.5256/f1000research.13189.r24792

[…] ublishers to use on their own platforms for enhancing the linkages between an authors’ publications. As a starting point, it is possible to upload a list of publications in a standard format, such as Bibtex or EndNote. It is also possible for a scientist with a ResearcherID to connect and migrate the existing content to ORCID and expand from that point. The ORCID application programming interface […]

library_books

Good enough practices in scientific computing

2017
PLoS Comput Biol
PMCID: 5480810
PMID: 28640806
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510

[…] nage data and software and is a good starting point for fully reproducible research. However, it requires all contributors to understand a much larger set of tools, including Markdown or LaTeX, Make, BiBTeX, and Git/GitHub. […]

library_books

OWL2 benchmarking for the evaluation of knowledge based systems

2017
PLoS One
PMCID: 5478156
PMID: 28632751
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179578

[…] eneration tool named UBA to generate datasets. LUBM uses fourteen queries to evaluate the performance of the KBS for data loading, repository size, query response time and combined complexity. Lehigh BibTeX Benchmark (LBBM) []generates the synthetic dataset on the basis of relevant extracted properties from the real domain documents.The Berlin SPARQL Benchmark (BSBM) [] was developed for comparing […]

Citations

Looking to check out a full list of citations?

TeX Live reviews

star_border star_border star_border star_border star_border
star star star star star

Be the first to review TeX Live